AN on-going row between an allotment holder and a parish council which resulted in the resignation of some councillors is heading to court to be resolved.

Back in 2017, Maureen Powles wanted to erect a summerhouse, which was larger than rules allow, on her allotment in Hurworth, near Darlington, to provide somewhere for her to take her disabled friend.

But Hurworth Parish Council refused permission for the structure to be built, saying it was outside the permitted limits.

They said the decision had nothing to do with the fact the summerhouse would be used by a disabled person, adding that 20 per cent of the allotments at the Strait Lane site are tended by disabled people.

Ms Powles said she was "disgusted" to then receive an eviction letter after she had complained about the decision.

The council defended their decision, saying Ms Powles was "not the registered tenant for the allotment".

The dispute between the two parties has been on-going since the middle of last year, and despite attempts to reach an agreement, an outcome will now be decided by a County Court.

Ms Powles began constructing the summerhouse, but took it down after being made aware of the rules set by the council.

She then appealed for special permission to re-build the structure for her disabled friend, but her request was refused.

After the row broke out last year, a number of parish councillors resigned from the council, with some confirming the on-going row had been part of the reason behind their decision.

An independent review into the decision was carried out by Darlington Borough Council last year, but it was found the Parish Council had acted correctly in reaching their decision.

It is understood the court case will centre around the Equalities Act and discrimination against the disabled.

Speaking last year, Ms Powles said she was "saddened, shocked and surprised" at the decision.

"I just want somewhere for her to feel safe and comfortable.

"It would give her a change of scenery and some fresh air."

Hurworth Parish Council said they would not comment on issues which are currently the subject of legal proceedings.

The case is expected to be heard early next year, although no date has been confirmed.