FOR some considerable time, BICC has been on brokers' sell lists on the grounds that its current rating anticipated earnings recovery up to three years away.
So it came as something of a surprise when the #170m rights issue was announced yesterday morning, although overall share price reaction was muted.
First impressions were of a comparatively small sum for shareholders to stump up into a company, which at the time of its interim had gearing of 80% and where strains in liquidity had the effect of removing any dividend growth for the subsequent two or three years.
The net effect will be to reduce gearing to 32% and enable the cables and construction group to invest much more quickly in relatively rapid payback situations.
That is the case with investment in cables in the Asia-Pacific region with the concentration on optical fibres receiving the lion's share of the #215m overall capital programme.
There will not be any significant impact upon earnings for at least a year, apart from a fall in interest charges as money waits to be spent. And with interest rates at current levels, the return will be less than from manufacturing.
However, BICC should soon begin to benefit from its costly reorganisation programme, which included the shedding of businesses such as housebuilding into which it should never have strayed, and also the recognition in the half-time figures that Balfour Beatty contract margins will be less than originally calculated.
The enigma remains the Private Finance Initiative and how quickly that will lead to substantial new work as many in the construction industry complain about the expenses of tendering and the delay in contracts being awarded.
Over the past dozen or so years, the stock has underperformed the market quite significantly although there does seem now to be the first signs of a way out of the trough.
The rights issue does bring forward the day when dividend growth can begin and BICC starts to move away from the current 12!sp plateau back to the 19!sp seen in the days when the company
was heavily overdistributing. That will not recur.
One should now be a cautious buyer.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article