''Tax-free profit, no harm done . . . Profit with principles.'' The first hot line, or rather ''blue line'', to an ethical investment is being heavily promoted by Friends Provident.
Friends, which is led by chief executive Peter Jones, above, launched the UK's first ethical fund, Stewardship, in 1984 and still has more than half the fast-growing #1700m sector. Now there's Stewardship International, enabling investors to get ''a very decent return, tax free, and without exploiting the earth's resources, human or otherwise''.
It is a Pep-able medium risk fund with a minimum #1000 investment. It replaces the North American Stewardship Trust and is invested 50% in the UK, 22% each in Europe and North America, 3% in Australasia.
Ethical funds held their own in performance terms until the big company boom of the last two years. The #468m Stewardship, for instance, has seen its three-year record pegged to 87.5% growth, compared with 105.8% for the average UK growth and income unit trust.
However the #75m Steward-ship Income has performed very badly, returning 57.2%.
George Spiers, at the Ethical Investment Cooperative of independent financial advisers, says Friends has a strong record and international diversification is a plus. ''In a lot of cases people make a moral choice as well as a financial choice.''
But Mark Dear, at ethical investment specialist adviser Holden Meehan in London, says Friends is not cheap (5.75% initial charge and 1.38% annual) while the even newer Standard Life ethical unit trust (3% and 0.95%) has a manager with a good small company record and a clean sheet with ''no deadwood holdings''. He is recommending Standard's Pep to new ethical investors.
RATING **
*** Worth considering
** Shop around
* Hype alert
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article