What next for Durham Tees Valley Airport?

DAVID CAMERON: Speaking last December DAVID CAMERON: Speaking last December

IN December last year, Prime Minister David Cameron called Durham Tees Valley Airport a vital transport link and said its long-term success was a question of “is it being invested in, is it being expanded, is it working well?”

Yesterday, Mr Cameron was accused of turning his back on the airport after the Government’s flagship enterprise fund rejected its request for support.

Peter Nears, strategic planning director at Durham Tees Valley, was last night waiting for confirmation that the Government had failed to back an ambitious plan to create 1,500 jobs through a massive new freight operation.

“We will clearly need to review the news if, and when, it is confirmed, but it would be a great disappointment because it was a scheme that was well advanced with occupier interest and it would have produced much-needed activity at the airport, as well as create jobs,” he said. “We remain committed to the delivery of the scheme, which is important for the long-term prosperity of the airport.”

Nearly 12 months ago, when a proposed sale of the airport was raised at Prime Minister’s Questions in the Commons, Mr Cameron said: “The key thing about the future of Durham Tees Airport – which is a vital airport – is not necessarily who owns it, but is it being invested in, is it being expanded, is it working well?”

In the House of Commons yesterday, Sedgefield MP Phil Wilson demanded that Business Secretary Vince Cable explain why the bid had been rejected. Mr Cable is expected to give a written response within a week.

Alex Cunningham, MP for Stockton North, wanted to know why the pledge of support for the airport given by the Prime Minister at the despatch box only a few months ago counts for absolutely nothing? He said: “The Prime Minister, answering a question from one of his own MPs, wished our airport well and spoke of how important regional airports were.

Now, he has turned his back on the Tees Valley.

“We are used to the Government putting the boot in on the Tees Valley, but we have now got all the more reason to pull together with local authorities, Tees Valley Unlimited, business, MPs and everyone else working with Peel to help them realise the vision they have to sustain and develop our local airport.

“I’m sure Peel didn’t come to our airport just because they thought they might secure a grant for development.

We all need to get behind the company and ensure we do everything to support them to develop and sustain it.”

Stockton South MP James Wharton and Councillor Doris Jones, who represents Middleton-St-George on Darlington Borough Council, said the funding blow would not prove fatal.

“While it is disappointing, the future of our airport will not be decided by this, but by Peel, which has the financial might to make it a success,”

said Mr Wharton. “People want more passenger routes to better destinations and that is what they should concentrate on. Additional investment would, of course, have been welcome, but it does not take away from what needs to be the real focus.

“The Regional Growth Fund has put millions of pounds into our local economy and, while it is a shame this bid was not successful, the scheme as a whole has made a big difference and is helping to deliver the economic rebalancing we need.”

Coun Jones said: “It’s crucial for this part of the North- East to have a local airport and I was keeping my fingers crossed that this funding would be granted.”

Despite the failure of the bid, Coun Jones said she hoped the freight operation would still go ahead. She said: “I think Peel could do it without Government backing.”

Passengers’ dismayed over potential closure

sfsdf CARL ASHBURNER, 26, from Redcar, east Cleveland, an offshore oil worker for BP, said: “I use the airport every week and the Aberdeen flight is always full. It’s often hard to get a seat on it, it’s that popular. If there were more planes going in and out of the airport they would still be full.

It would be terrible if it closed. A lot of oil rig workers use this airport and we would have to go to Newcastle or get the train instead, which takes about five hours.”

BRIAN TOKELL, 62, from Darlington, who works in Aberdeen, said: “I use the airport every three weeks. It would be devastating for the area if it closed.”

sfsdf TOM LUMB, 24, a chemical engineer from Redcar, who was picking up a friend on the Aberdeen flight, said: “It is important for the area and takes a lot of people to and from work. My friend works in Aberdeen, so it is very important for him to get to work. The problem is they don’t have enough flights going out.

It’s gone downhill recently though.”

sfsdf GRAEME MINTO, 37, an offshore oil rig worker from Norton, near Stockton, said: “It is very sad what’s happened to this airport.

If it closed, it would definitely be bad for the area. I use this airport every five weeks and the flight is full every time.”

sfsdf BARRY EARL, 59, a hydrographic surveyor from Kirkbymoorside, North Yorkshire, uses the airport about 12 times a year.

He said: “It is my local airport and it is a shame what’s happened to it – it’s like a ghost town now. We have to pay a £6 fee just to use the airport, which, we were told, was to keep it going. But, if it shuts, will we get our money back?

“I have used the airport for eight years and have almost never seen the Aberdeen flight with an empty seat. This is the most handy airport for me, but if it shut I would have to go to Newcastle.”

Comments(9)

oliviaden6 says...
12:59pm Fri 19 Oct 12

From where i am sitting PEEL have done nothing but drag the living daylights out of this regional airport it has been in steep decline for the past 10 years and PEEL have done nothing but prevaricate all along. It is a asset that the North East needs and should be used to its full extent not every wants to schlep all the way to East Midlands/Leeds Bradford/ Newcastle Peel i believe have a hidden agenda to sell the land off at a vast profit and do away with the Airport completely a crying shame. SHAME ON PEEL AND SHAME ON THE Government.

oliviaden6 says...
12:59pm Fri 19 Oct 12

From where i am sitting PEEL have done nothing but drag the living daylights out of this regional airport it has been in steep decline for the past 10 years and PEEL have done nothing but prevaricate all along. It is a asset that the North East needs and should be used to its full extent not every wants to schlep all the way to East Midlands/Leeds Bradford/ Newcastle Peel i believe have a hidden agenda to sell the land off at a vast profit and do away with the Airport completely a crying shame. SHAME ON PEEL AND SHAME ON THE Government.

DarloXman says...
4:30pm Fri 19 Oct 12

In fairness to Peel just a few years back many new carriers and flights were launched - but it just didn't work. The carriers would have stayed if they were making a profit - but low volume meant losing routes. The flights to Aberdeen may be popular but where else? The writing was on the wall when BMI pulled out and the Heathrow route was lost.

It has nothing to do with the government.- it's just simple economics and scale of operation - it is cheaper to operate at larger airports (Newcastle/Leeds Bradford) with greater volume. No further 'taxpayer money' should be spent on the airport.

The talk of a freight operation is just pie in the sky. What is there that routinely needs to be shipped by air? Sea freight is much, much cheaper. Suggestions of 1500 jobs is just ridiculous.

I'm afraid the airport is going to be as much use to the region as the Darlington Football Club stadium! Any ideas on a post card please!

spragger says...
9:10pm Fri 19 Oct 12

This place has been dead in the water for years
Why throw loads of other peoples money at it?
Once the local Councils were involved its days were numbered

Herorich says...
9:26pm Fri 19 Oct 12

The way I understood it, peel were too greedy and drove all the business away eg bmi, Ryanair etc together with all the charters due to excessive charges. They are even scaring off the customers with additional passenger charges. Their financial models are fundimentally floored. They need to take a long term view and offer incentives to bring airlines and passengers back which over time (and not tomorrow) leads to sustainable profit. Just jacking the prices up to compensate foor low volume is vicious downhill circle. I vote for new transformational management/ownership

timm says...
3:57am Sat 20 Oct 12

Simple. Change the name back to Teesside Airport. Do it NOW before it`s too late.

AndyAsh says...
10:51am Sat 20 Oct 12

To me its simple, the north east doesn't generate enough demand for 2 airports. Over the last 15 years Newcastle Airport has improved hugely and Teesside has steadily declined.

If enough people wanted to fly from the Tees Valley then the airport would be a success, its just business sense that if enough people want to fly someone will provide the flight. If not they won't.

So instead of spending any more public money spent on the airport would this be better spent on improving rail links to Newcastle and / or Leeds. Giving far more benefits than the airport ever would.

Newcastle is only an hour away after all for a far superior airport, it might be an inconvenience initially but I seriously doubt many people would stop flying because of a 1 hour drive.

andygib263 says...
12:49pm Sat 20 Oct 12

Just failing due to the chose of destinations. For years me and my missus along with friends have used DTV but destinations are now limited. The flights to amsterdam are great and we will use that route again but bring back a service to heathrow or gatwick and you will start making money.

Even a person who doesnt use it for business would love to use it. Save the cost of a taxi to newcastle as well

Homshaw1 says...
9:49am Sun 21 Oct 12

How about low cost landing charges, vastly improved transport links, cheap parking

Go for a low cost high volume model

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree