Blow for Durham Tees Valley Airport as regeneration cash bid rejected

Durham Tees Valley Airport: Cash gloom Durham Tees Valley Airport: Cash gloom

A BOLD plan to revive a North-East airport is in danger of collapse after the Government rejected its bid for regeneration cash, The Northern Echo can reveal.

Ailing Durham Tees Valley Airport (DTV) applied for cash from the Regional Growth Fund (RGF) to build a massive freight operation on land south of the airport runway.

It was hoped the £5.9m scheme, which would take ten years to complete and create up to 1,500 jobs, could breathe new life into the airport, which was close to going out of business last year amid falling passenger numbers.

Details of the successful RGF applicants will be revealed tomorrow, but The Northern Echo understands that the bid by the airport’s owner, Peel Holdings, is not on the final list. The blow will again prompt questions about the future of one of the region’s key transport links.

The plan to launch a freight operation at DTV was hailed by local MPs when it was announced in June. The bid for Government cash received strong backing from Tees Valley Unlimited Local Enterprise Partnership, the Homes and Communities Agency, together with Stockton and Darlington borough councils.

Neil Schneider, chief executive of Stockton Borough Council, the lead authority in the six councils which are minority shareholders in the airport, said: “We have received no notification hat the airport’s application to the Regional Grown Fund has been unsuccessful,” he said.

“Indeed, our most recent information was that the bid had made it past the initial shortlist.”

A number of previous schemes aimed at developing the south side of the airport failed to materialise.

They included a project to create one of the biggest cargo-handling centres in Europe, which was first approved in 1999, but abandoned three years later.

The planned £110m Skylink International Business Park, announced four years ago, stalled because of no funding.

Peel Holdings came out fighting in March with a new marketing campaign backed by operator KLM, which runs three daily services to Amsterdam.

Airport bosses have not given up hope of boosting passenger numbers too, despite seeing them fall from a high of nearly one million in 2006 to about 200,000 this year.

However, recent talks with airlines have failed to bring any new routes to the region.

The airport is due to hold a board meeting tomorrow, where the latest developments will be discussed.

Comments(6)

Insp Clouseau says...
12:16pm Thu 18 Oct 12

If this is correct......What next?
Will there be a criminal investigation into why certain councillors backed the selling of Teesside Airport to Peel Holdings for the very small sum of £500 thousand?

Who sanctioned the sale to Peel?

Could this be the start of another investigation into a certain few who gave away Teesside airport and its hundreds of acres of building land to Peel ten years ago for £500k!

Another case of no smoke without fire I reckon. Who was on the Airport sale panel ten years ago?

Peel never did put in the promised £20m investment, so surely they should hand the land back to the councils under a breach of contract clause.

Peel do have form for buying airports for a pound in the past, and then turning them into a building site.

Try googling "Sheffield Airport" which was also purchased around the same time as Teesside, and the wikipedia site tells and intersting story on how Peel got the airport for £1 and closed it shortly after.

Strange that Teesside's history appears to be going the same way now Peel own it.

JM says...
12:50pm Thu 18 Oct 12

Meanwhile we pay £52.56 million per day to be ruled by the EU, in return for £29.53 million per day strings-attached refunding.(Source: Table 9.2, Balance of Payments Pink Book, published 31 July 2012), fully supported by LibLabCon.

oliviaden6 says...
7:20pm Thu 18 Oct 12

PEEL have proved their INCOMPETENCE from day one this latest debacle was a nonstarter from the outset. Alas once again who loses( JOE PUBLIC) The Boroughs involved should instigate a Compulsory Purchase and then get EDDIE STOBARD or Virgin interested.

DarloXman says...
10:48pm Thu 18 Oct 12

At last some sense from a Government body.

Who want's to transport freight by air? It's very expensive and only going to get more so as fuel becomes more and more expensive. There is very little need for routine business to be shipped via air - only the very occasional rush orders. I can still remember the massive (and ridiculous) proposals for the freight terminal in the 90's - a large part of the business case was based on shipping Samsung TVs manufactured in Winyard - well of course where are they now!!

Any funding this time around would have just been a gift to Peel and there would have been absolutely no chance of 1500 jobs being created.

Whoever has made the decision should have a very bright future in the Civil Service! Well done.

Voice-of-reality says...
11:16pm Thu 18 Oct 12

There is not sufficient business to keep this airport open. The sooner this is realised the better. Terribly unfortunate for those presently employed there - but a reality of life - if you do not provide the services required you are surplus to requirements. Better that the staff start looking for new jobs now - good luck to them.

jewitt says...
9:59am Fri 19 Oct 12

Sad to say but the airport has had its day. the infrastructure around is very poor and frankly the prices of flights from Teesside to where I want to go are horrendous.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree