Warning over benefits shake-up

THE leader of a North-East council has accused the Government of acting like headless chickens over controversial proposals to shake up the council tax benefit system.

Councillor Bill Dixon, Labour leader of Darlington Borough Council, said the Government had panicked over criticism of its proposal to cut subsidies for council tax benefit “amid the spectre of the poll tax”.

Earlier this year, the Government announced plans to localise council tax from April and cut the grants from which authorities pay council tax benefits by 12 per cent, although pensioners will be exempt.

Each council will be allowed to decide how much of the cut it passes on to claimants, and how much of the burden councils shoulder out of general budgets.

Earlier yesterday, the Department for Communities and Local Government (DCLG) announced a £100m grant to ensure councils do not pass on the worst of the burden to the claimant, amid fears that the poorest working families will be hardest hit by the policy.

Councillor Dixon said: “The spectre of the poll tax is looming large for the Tories. As usual they are throwing money at it. They should have deferred the whole thing for a year and worked it out, instead of panicking like a bunch of headless chickens.”

In a statement, the DCLG said: “As councils draw up their local schemes, it is clear that many are delivering savings without unfairly increasing the burden on those who are currently on benefits.

“Equally, there are some councils which are asking for very large additional contributions from those on benefits.

“The grant will be a simple one, easy to apply for and swiftly paid out, to help those councils who choose to do the right thing.”

Comments(2)

Voice-of-reality says...
6:22pm Wed 17 Oct 12

It will be interesting to note those councils that manage to save money through efficency (thereby costing the tax payer not a penny more) and those that merely charge more. The latter will, I suspect, be councils predominantly in the north and wilol probably include Darlington. That they will pass on costs to the poorest in society (rather than finding efficency savings) will be presented, quite wrongly as the fault of the Conservatives. It will not be. If Erewash (a mid ranging Borough in the Midlands centred uppon Ilkeston and former coal mining areas can manage to find efficency savings under the enlightened approach of its former Lead Member for Finance)- so can Darlington. The one difference of course is that the political leaders of Darlington, like County Durham would rather, ideologically, continue to 'hit the poor' in the safe knowledge that the majority of that self same part of the electorate will continue to vote for them.

Homshaw1 says...
10:43am Thu 18 Oct 12

I am no Tory and Bill Dixon is entitled to his opinion albeit entirely subjective.

Both the council and the government have failed to come up with a solution to a real problem

Yes I want to see the sick and disadvantaged enjoy a dignified lifestyle and I don't mind paying taxes to support it

However I'm sick of the hangers on and the work shy ecpecting a five star lifestyle at other peoples expense

Both central and local government need to find a way of differentiating between them and dealing with them.

No I don't want 25 year olds sleeping rough to escape a poor home environment. Neither do I want a 45 year old who has never worked through idlleness living it up at tax payers expense

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree