Charity plans for council's assets (From Darlington and Stockton Times)
Send us your pictures, video, news and views by texting DST to 80360 or email us
Charity plans for council's assets
8:00am Tuesday 17th January 2012 in News
Exclusive By Mark Tallentire, Reporter (Durham)
THEATRES, museums, libraries and leisure centres owned by taxpayers could be handed over to be run by a charitable trust, under a radical shake-up being considered by council chiefs.
Facing cuts of nearly £150m over the next five years, Labour-led Durham County Council is contemplating placing dozens of leisure and culture assets into a not-for-profit trust as early as next year.
Click here for a detailed map of the facilities included in the council's proposed transfer
The huge list, obtained exclusively by The Northern Echo, includes flagship venues such as Durham’s Gala Theatre, Freeman’s Quay leisure centre and Durham Light Infantry (DLI) Museum, Bishop Auckland Town Hall, Consett’s Empire Theatre, Killhope: The North of England Lead Mining Museum, in upper Weardale, and Hardwick Park, Sedgefield.
Click here for a detailed map of the facilities included in the council's proposed transfer
In all, there are 39 libraries, 15 leisure centres, two theatres, two museums, an arts centre and an outdoor learning centre, in Middleton-in-Teesdale.
“In these difficult times, the status quo is almost certainly unsustainable and a trust like this could prove the best way to protect and even improve these services.
Councillor Maria Plews
Sports development, arts development, countryside and outdoor sport and leisure services could also be “outsourced”.
The new as-yet-unnamed trust would be a not-for-profit charitable group known as a Non Profit Distributing Organisation (NPDO).
One of the biggest of its kind in the country, it would have a budget of more than £30m.
The council would retain ownership of the facilities but the trust would be responsible for managing and running them. It would be run by trustees and a management board, although who might sit on such bodies remains unclear.
Council officials believe the change, which they say has been successful elsewhere, is a simple way of saving at least £1m a year in business rates and VAT, and would allow leisure and culture bosses to tap into funding pots closed off to local authorities.
Next week, the authority’s executive cabinet will be asked to agree “in principle” to transfer into a trust the first batch of these facilities, known as Phase A.
Councillors will also be asked to sanction further research into putting into a trust a second batch, known as Phase B.
Councillor Maria Plews, Durham County Council’s cabinet member for leisure, libraries and lifelong learning, said: “In these difficult times, the status quo is almost certainly unsustainable and a trust like this could prove the best way to protect and even improve these services.
“While we are currently considering the full range of sport, leisure, cultural and library services, further consideration will be given to exactly which areas will transfer prior to a final decision in the autumn.
“In depth research will ensure we follow a tried and tested line which will deliver the best service for residents and the financial savings we have no choice but to make.”
The council’s cabinet will discuss the proposals at County Hall, Durham, on Wednesday, January 25, at 9.30am.
Final decisions are expected this autumn and the new trust could take over as early as April next year.
Trust would be one of the biggest
DURHAM County Council’s proposed leisure and culture trust would be one of the biggest of its kind in the country.
From a 350-year-old country park to a £12.3m state-of-theart swimming pool; from tiny village libraries to a county’s premier theatre.
The new charitable trust Durham County Council wants to run its leisure and culture services would boast an impressive portfolio.
Thirty-nine libraries from miniature Belmont to landmark Bishop Auckland Town Hall; 15 leisure centres from little Abbey to flagship Freeman’s Quay; all facilities run by Leisureworks in Derwentside and Leisure Connection in east Durham; and the £14m Gala Theatre, in Durham City.
All of these are in Phase A – effectively being fasttracked for handover.
Phase B, for which more research is planned, includes the Durham Light Infantry (DLI) Museum, Killhope: The Northern of England Lead Mining Museum, Middletonin- Teesdale outdoor learning centre, Sedgefield’s Hardwick Country Park, various picnics and playgrounds, sports development services including coaching and arts development services including festivals.
Some will likely move over without visitors noticing any change. Certainly, council officials hope so.
They are playing down the shake-up as a “no brainer” – an easy method of saving money without frontline service cutbacks and getting cash from bodies such as Sport England and the Heritage Lottery Fund.
But others could prove more controversial. Bishop Auckland Town Hall is a much-loved landmark dating back to the mid-19th Century.
Hardwick Park recently underwent a £10m revamp. Freeman’s Quay, which cost £12.3m, only opened in July 2008. The military treasures of the DLI Museum would no doubt attract both legal and emotional argument.
Of course, the trust idea is not entirely new. Durham council chiefs believe it has been successful in Stockton, Redcar and Cleveland and further afield.
Even within County Durham, Leisureworks has run the Lamplight Arts Centre and the Louisa Centre, in Stanley, and the Empire Theatre and Belle Vue swim and leisure centres, in Consett, since June 2007.
Leisure Connection has run Peterlee and Seaham leisure centres since April 2003.
Councillor Mark Wilkes, Liberal Democrat shadow portfolio holder for regeneration, said putting leisure centres into a trust could potentially save a lot of money, but asked why the authority hadn’t moved sooner – before closing two leisure centres last autumn.
Terry Collins, the council’s corporate director for neighbourhood services, said a trust offered communities much better opportunities to decide how their local services were run and there was a great deal of evidence to suggest trusts protect services and enhance their chances for improvement, via new funding sources.
“It’s important in the current climate that we remain open-minded about new possibilities.
The savings to the council are not in doubt, the non-domestic (business) rate and VAT relief alone would deliver much-needed savings,” Mr Collins added.
However, questions still remain.
Who will run this new trust? How accountable will it be to voters? How much freedom will it have from County Hall? Who will set its budget and spending priorities?
What happens when spending cuts bite?
Before final decisions are taken, taxpayers will want reassurances their museums and libraries are not being privatised by stealth.
Comments(14)
The Grim North
says...
10:52am Tue 17 Jan 12
Graham R C Stevenson
says...
11:16am Tue 17 Jan 12
sherburn
says...
11:30am Tue 17 Jan 12
sherburn
says...
11:35am Tue 17 Jan 12
D D Coy
says...
11:36am Tue 17 Jan 12
The New DCC never attempted to save a single penny from its inception from April 2009. Councillors and Directors filled their own boots despite promising savings of £21m per annum in 2006.
My main concerns are who the trustee's will be if Plan A / B go ahead. Trustee's will no doubt be paid at least expenses, so there will be a queue of Councillors for the posts, they need to be kept to the bare minimum of just one but my biggest worry is that a former Director of DCC will be appointed Chairman of the proposed New Trust, this under all circumstance should not be allowed to happen "No Labour Crony in charge!".
But ultimately if DCC will save just £1 million by removing such assets, why bother in the first place. Other areas of DCC can achieve much large savings, without any risk to the cultural heritage of County Durham?
What has really boiled my blood over the past year is Simon Hinge sticking his oar into the Zuburans and Auckland Castle, and he can't even keep his own house in order, just like the M.P for Bishop Auckland they make very good sound-bites but leave an averse effect on the project, when they haven't got a clue about the realities of such projects.
DCC is in crisis with the probability of bankruptcy and special measures looking inevitable.
'The blind leading the blind' the leader of DCC Simon Hinge should be unhinged pronto, as he hasn't got a clue and neither has the Cabinet.
Roll-on May 2013...
sherburn
says...
11:46am Tue 17 Jan 12
D D Coy
says...
11:55am Tue 17 Jan 12
sherburn wrote:The Labour Party are committing 'Political Suicide' in County Durham, they need a miracle at all levels, the cuts haven't even started to bite and they should have been ahead of the curve if they had leadership.
I would also like to here what Rubbish MP Roberta Blackman Woods opinion is on this she is nothing but a photo opportunist says she has saved things but its nothing but lies
sherburn
says...
2:01pm Tue 17 Jan 12
D D Coy
says...
4:18pm Tue 17 Jan 12
Why doesn't DCC stop funding the following Quango,
Association of North East Councils..
Link:
http://www.northeast
councils.gov.uk/abou
tus/index.cfm
Along with other councils in the region they fund this P.R Machine with a Chief Executive & a dozen or so staff, time to pull the plug, not an essential service.
Q. How much is this costing annually?
Finally why don't DCC make the fleet of limos and drivers redundant (the drivers can spill the beans on what they get up-to, so this won't happen) and save the Council Tax payer a few hundred thousand pounds, they are not an essential service.
Birdyy
says...
7:07pm Tue 17 Jan 12
D D Coy
says...
9:28pm Tue 17 Jan 12
Birdyy wrote:It is indeed very easy to be critical, it is also very easy to spend the Council Tax. and government funds
Excellent idea. Easy to be critical. Harder to make a difference.
It was also extremely easy for Cabinet Members to award themselves an annual salary inclusive of expenses of £30,000 per annum (£600 per week), it is very easy to blame the government for the mess that DCC finds itself in, it seems very easy to make front line staff redundant, yet harder to make managers redundant, it seems increasingly easy to breakup an organisation the size of DCC (which was created to become one of the largest Local Authorities in the UK because both management and the ruling Labour Cabinet with a majority of just 5?) without due public consultation, it is very easy to see the contempt the ruling Labour Group have for both the staff and electorate of Durham County Durham.
What Labour at DCC are doing is tantamount to what Margaret Thatcher did to Consett Steel, East Durham Coal & Shildon Rail.
The current events at County Hall are akin to Communism with a Politburu mesmerised by a leader and in total shock at the scale of the task before it and bound to fail very shortly.
And that is the difference!
Birdyy
says...
7:34pm Wed 18 Jan 12
D D Coy wrote:Not sure what all that has to do with a Charitable Trust.
Birdyy wrote:It is indeed very easy to be critical, it is also very easy to spend the Council Tax. and government funds
Excellent idea. Easy to be critical. Harder to make a difference.
It was also extremely easy for Cabinet Members to award themselves an annual salary inclusive of expenses of £30,000 per annum (£600 per week), it is very easy to blame the government for the mess that DCC finds itself in, it seems very easy to make front line staff redundant, yet harder to make managers redundant, it seems increasingly easy to breakup an organisation the size of DCC (which was created to become one of the largest Local Authorities in the UK because both management and the ruling Labour Cabinet with a majority of just 5?) without due public consultation, it is very easy to see the contempt the ruling Labour Group have for both the staff and electorate of Durham County Durham.
What Labour at DCC are doing is tantamount to what Margaret Thatcher did to Consett Steel, East Durham Coal & Shildon Rail.
The current events at County Hall are akin to Communism with a Politburu mesmerised by a leader and in total shock at the scale of the task before it and bound to fail very shortly.
And that is the difference!
No assets will transfer to the trust so what is the issue? Maybe you could apply for a post.
It's a great idea. Not all change is BAD
D D Coy
says...
10:05pm Wed 18 Jan 12
Birdyy wrote:The issue's are, that once a new trust is created are the positions of frontline staff protected & will management be culled with new blood brought in? Will staff and the council tax payer be consulted with due consideration?
D D Coy wrote:Not sure what all that has to do with a Charitable Trust.
Birdyy wrote:It is indeed very easy to be critical, it is also very easy to spend the Council Tax. and government funds
Excellent idea. Easy to be critical. Harder to make a difference.
It was also extremely easy for Cabinet Members to award themselves an annual salary inclusive of expenses of £30,000 per annum (£600 per week), it is very easy to blame the government for the mess that DCC finds itself in, it seems very easy to make front line staff redundant, yet harder to make managers redundant, it seems increasingly easy to breakup an organisation the size of DCC (which was created to become one of the largest Local Authorities in the UK because both management and the ruling Labour Cabinet with a majority of just 5?) without due public consultation, it is very easy to see the contempt the ruling Labour Group have for both the staff and electorate of Durham County Durham.
What Labour at DCC are doing is tantamount to what Margaret Thatcher did to Consett Steel, East Durham Coal & Shildon Rail.
The current events at County Hall are akin to Communism with a Politburu mesmerised by a leader and in total shock at the scale of the task before it and bound to fail very shortly.
And that is the difference!
No assets will transfer to the trust so what is the issue? Maybe you could apply for a post.
It's a great idea. Not all change is BAD
Whom will reside in the following posts New Director, Chairman, Trustee's etc. Political intervention needs to be kept to the very minimum, once the trust has been created.
I'm not worried at all regarding any assets, collections, buildings, land etc. those will certainly be ring-fenced & the culture of the county can never be removed so that is also very safe.
If DCC follow the Wigan model then the Trust may stand a fighting chance. Wigan was the very first & succesful, I recall that it was created in 2005/6 following extensive research and consultation, plus the financial pressure was much less, so the decision wasn't rushed.
Consultation is the key!
GeordieB says...
9:40am Tue 17 Jan 12
How about getting rid of all the non-jobs at County Hall first?