Rome, Monday.
THE disclosure by an anti-Mafia priest that a man had confessed to him
of his part in some of the criminal organisation's bloodiest attacks has
caused furious ethical debate to rage across Italy.
Father Paolo Turturro, who works in a Mafia-ridden district of the
Sicilian capital Palermo, told parishioners about the confession in his
Christmas Day sermon.
Turturro, protected by a 24-hour police escort, said a 22-year-old man
told him in confession on December 23 that he took part in the killing
of anti-Mafia Judge Giovanni Falcone in May last year, and in four other
Mafia ambushes.
Falcone, his wife, and three bodyguards were killed when a bomb
exploded under their car.
Last month, magistrates issued 18 arrest warrants for the murder and
said they believed they had identified all those who took part.
Turturro said he believed the man, who came to him at his Santa Lucia
Church, was telling the truth because ''he had tears in his eyes and
asked for forgiveness''.
When magistrates questioned him at the weekend, he exercised his right
under Italian law and his duty under Church law to not disclose what he
learned in the confessional.
Religious and secular commentators criticised him today for disclosing
the confession at all.
Some accused him of going out of his way to court media attention in
his anti-Mafia fight. Others said he should resign from the priesthood
and tell all he knows to investigators.
''This is very grave and I hope he did it without realising what he
was doing,'' said Bishop Ersilio Tonini of Ravenna, a leading
commentator on church affairs.
''One should ask forgiveness in the name of the entire church for a
gesture that is not becoming of a priest,'' Tonini said.
According to canon law, Turturro risks excommunication if he reveals
the person's identity or if the information disclosed makes it ''readily
known''.-- Reuter.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article