SECRET talks are under way aimed at transferring the Lockerbie bomber from Scotland to a prison in Libya or a neighbouring north African country.
A deal to return Abdelbaset Ali Mohmed al Megrahi would probably mean the end of his appeal against the minimum 27-year jail sentence he is serving in Greenock prison.
UK, American, and Libyan security agencies would all prefer the case not to be reopened publicly, especially with improving relations between the three countries as Washington and London rebuild links with Colonel Gaddafi as part of their war on terror in other countries.
In addition, a successful appeal by Megrahi would prove highly embarrassing for the Scottish judicial system, while moving him nearer home to a Muslim jail would satisfy Tripoli's demands after it offered compensation to families of the 270 Lockerbie victims.
However, a transfer would infuriate some of the families, and critics of the original conviction, who believe Megrahi is innocent and want a public inquiry. In 2003, he was jailed for life for the 1988 explosion and told he must serve at least 27 years, originally in a GBP250,000 solitary unit at Barlinnie, Glasgow.
The Scottish Criminal Cases Review Commission is considering whether he can appeal. It is expected next year to refer the case back to the appeal court because of new evidence, said to undermine his conviction.
British, US, and Libyan officials have met in London and Geneva to discuss whether Megrahi could be moved to a prison in Libya or neighbouring African country before the decision is made.
A source close to the discussions said that, once Megrahi was back in Libya, the application to the commission could be dropped.
The Foreign Office denied official talks have taken place, but insiders said the US State Department, Musa Kusa, former head of Libyan intelligence, and Foreign Office officials have all been involved.
A source said: "The Libyans are promoting this transfer very quietly. The idea is to allow him to move to a Muslim prison in or near Libya to avoid the case being referred back to the courts. Once there he would probably be able to do as he wished."
Megrahi's wife, Aisha, and family left their safe house in Newton Mearns, near Glasgow, this year and returned to Libya.
Tam Dalyell, former MP, said "people are discussing preparations" and it shows the government "would want to avoid the horror of the commission finding that the verdict was unsafe and . . . to save the face of Scottish justice".
Kathleen Flynn, whose son died in the tragedy, said: "This is absolutely absurd and would mean Megrahi would walk in one door and out the other."
The Foreign Office said it was "not aware of any negotiations to move him back to Libya".
The US State Department said:
"Our preference is that Megrahi remains in Scotland."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article