Flagship Scottish Government schemes to help people in danger of having their homes repossessed have been branded "useless."
The accusation was made by Labour health spokesperson Cathy Jamieson after it emerged yesterday that no-one had received help from one of its trumpeted rescue policies - Mortgage to Shared Equity (MTSE).
The latest figures show that between January and May there were 3317 court actions for repossessions, and Labour has been highly critical of Deputy First Minister Nicola Sturgeon's attempts to help householders facing the loss of their homes.
Ms Jamieson said: "Last month we found that her Mortgage to Rent scheme had just one successful application and now we find that her Mortgage to Shared Equity is a disaster."
The scheme was launched in March to complement the existing Mortgage to Rent package.
Mortgage to Rent gives people the option of selling their home to a local authority or housing association, while Shared Equity enables the government to take a stake in the debtor's home.
Its failure to help anyone was uncovered by Linlithgow Labour MSP Mary Mulligan, who asked how many households had applied for assistance.
Housing Minister Alex Neil told her: "Since the inception of MTSE, five households have been eligible for consideration for the scheme. Two have replied to say they wished to be considered for Mortgage to Rent instead, and the remaining three have still to reply."
The Mortgage to Rent Scheme has also been heavily criticised, as The Herald reported last month, when it was revealed that only one person had benefited from it since the SNP administration changed the criteria in March.
Ms Jamieson claimed Ms Sturgeon, whose portfolio includes housing, was "failing to get the message".
She said: "She hails her own schemes but when examined we found out just how useless her management of them has been."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article