A doctor who ''almost gave a woman patient an orgasm'' during an internal examination was jailed for two years by a judge at Peterborough Crown Court yesterday.
Passing sentence Judge Peter Crane told Dr Graham Reynolds, 54, women patients were entitled to expect a doctor to behave with ''complete professionalism''.
The married GP, of Godmanchester, Cambridgeshire, was convicted last month of three counts of indecent assault against women at his surgery in Huntingdon between 1990 and 1996.
Judge Crane said he accepted the internal examinations were required. ''But in these cases you turned what should have been a medical examination into an opportunity for indecent assault,'' he added. ''For example, count five involved a woman being brought almost to orgasm and count nine involved the rubbing of the clitoris.
''This was a betrayal of trust and you have let down not only yourself but your profession and your partners.'' The judge added: ''Dr Reynolds had given very good medical attention to many patients over the years - including many women - and the conviction had had a devastating effect on his family.
''I have to weigh the good that you have done and the effect upon you against the need to mark the seriousness of what happened to deter anyone who might be tempted to act in that way.''
The jury of six men and six women found him guilty on three counts and acquitted him of another four charges dating back to 1984.
Reynolds denied any improper conduct. Miss Nicola Davies QC, defending, said he had not worked since his arrest in July last year and had now retired on the grounds of ill-health. His case would be automatically referred to the General Medical Council and it was highly likely he would be struck off.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article