Owners of Grade II-listed Stockton building fined for turning it into flats without permission

First published in News Darlington and Stockton Times: Photograph of the Author by , Reporter (Stockton/Hartlepool)

THE owners and site manager of a Grade II-listed property in Stockton have been fined a total of £5,240 after admitting carrying out building works without listed building consent.

Stockton Borough Council prosecuted the owner and site manager at Teesside Crown Court yesterday (Tuesday, August 12) under the Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) Act.

A council press release explained that on December 6, 2013, a planning officer noticed that works were being undertaken at the 170 year old property at 78 Norton Road.

The site was inspected and officers found that works were being carried out to convert the building into flats without proper permission.

In mitigation, the magistrates were told that the company said that the majority of the damage had been done prior to the company buying the building at auction.

The works carried out were necessary to ensure that the property was not damaged further as it had been broken into on two occasions and water had leaked into the property.

The owners were fined £2,000 and ordered to pay £500 towards costs and a victim surcharge of £120 and the site manager was fined £2,000 and ordered to pay £500 towards costs and a victim surcharge of £120.

Stockton Council’s cabinet member for regeneration and transport, Councillor Mike Smith, said: “ I hope this case will act as a warning that any unauthorised changes to listed buildings are not tolerated.”

Comments (3)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

10:41pm Wed 13 Aug 14

ezopek says...

80% of buildings in centre of Stockton or close area are Grade-something-list
ed buildings. Owners of most of them don't care about them at all. Or if somebody cares and want to renovate them/change something to make them more useful instead of leaving them empty and ruined, needs to go through a looot of bureaucracy and spend a lot of money. And that's why Stockton looks just like that how it looks...
80% of buildings in centre of Stockton or close area are Grade-something-list ed buildings. Owners of most of them don't care about them at all. Or if somebody cares and want to renovate them/change something to make them more useful instead of leaving them empty and ruined, needs to go through a looot of bureaucracy and spend a lot of money. And that's why Stockton looks just like that how it looks... ezopek
  • Score: -2

10:42pm Wed 13 Aug 14

ezopek says...

80% of buildings in centre of Stockton or close area are Grade-something-list
ed buildings. Owners of most of them don't care about them at all. Or if somebody cares and want to renovate them/change something to make them more useful instead of leaving them empty and ruined, needs to go through a looot of bureaucracy and spend a lot of money. And that's why Stockton looks just like how it looks...
80% of buildings in centre of Stockton or close area are Grade-something-list ed buildings. Owners of most of them don't care about them at all. Or if somebody cares and want to renovate them/change something to make them more useful instead of leaving them empty and ruined, needs to go through a looot of bureaucracy and spend a lot of money. And that's why Stockton looks just like how it looks... ezopek
  • Score: -4

1:12pm Thu 14 Aug 14

calumannabel says...

I bet the owners weren't white Methodists! Why not name and shame the vandals who wrecked this building?
I bet the owners weren't white Methodists! Why not name and shame the vandals who wrecked this building? calumannabel
  • Score: 3

Comments are closed on this article.

Send us your news, pictures and videos

Most read stories

Local Info

Enter your postcode, town or place name

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree