Frustration as CCTV is to be turned off in Richmond despite efforts from local businesses to provide funding

Frustration as CCTV is to be turned off despite efforts from local businesses to provide funding

Frustration as CCTV is to be turned off despite efforts from local businesses to provide funding

First published in News Darlington and Stockton Times: Photograph of the Author by , Reporter (Richmond)

BUSINESS owners have voiced their frustration that a CCTV system in a North Yorkshire market town is to be switched off despite a long-running fight to keep the cameras rolling.

Two years ago Richmondshire District Council said it would turn off Richmond’s CCTV cameras in a cost-cutting measure, but Richmond and Lower Swaledale Business Association (RLSBA) pledged to fund the system itself through donations from residents and businesses.

The association also collected more than 3,000 signatures in a petition calling for the cameras to be saved for the sake of the town’s security.

But now RLSBA can no longer afford to keep the system running so the cameras will be switched off on Monday (March 31).

The CCTV costs about £25,000 per year and the district council had agreed to continue to manage the contracts with all costs met by RLSBA.

RLSBA chairwoman Melva Steckles said: “Unfortunately the association has found it is not able to fund the system with private funding.

“It is not through a lack of enthusiasm or trying but it really was a big ask for us. It is a shame because a lot of hard work had been done by members.”

Former chairman of RLSBA Philip Wicks said despite a rush of support from smaller, independent retailers and businesses in the town, the group realised last autumn that its future was unsustainable.

He said: “It is really disappointing and frustrating. Smaller businesses have been very supportive but what we were missing were larger, national businesses and pubs.

“Despite our best efforts we were not able to generate enough funding and we did not have the confidence to enter into a contract for another three years.”

He added: “We need Richmond to be safe, and it is very important for the night time economy. I think it’s a backward step and it’s such a shame.”

Pat Wilson, business and community manager at Richmondshire District Council, said: “The council decided CCTV would have to be switched off a couple of years ago but funding was taken on by the association.

“The cameras will remain in place until late summer so if further funding can be found before then they could be switched back on.”

But Mr Wicks warned: “Once the cameras are taken down they will be gone for good – it will be too expensive to re-install the entire system.”

Comments (2)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

2:04pm Wed 26 Mar 14

cushybutterfield says...

Pathetic yet Britain provides BILLIONS in *working Taxpayers money in ******overseas aid***** to look after half the world, yet we cannot look after people in Richmond, Yorkshire for a few thousand quid. What a Country,a shocking appalling, disgrace.
Pathetic yet Britain provides BILLIONS in *working Taxpayers money in ******overseas aid***** to look after half the world, yet we cannot look after people in Richmond, Yorkshire for a few thousand quid. What a Country,a shocking appalling, disgrace. cushybutterfield
  • Score: 2

9:52pm Fri 4 Apr 14

Dm0203 says...

This is a brilliant bit of news, especially seeing as two days later I was assaulted. The extra police work that will be involved in order to catch the perpetrators, not just in my case, is surely more costly than 25k a year? Not to mention the extra distress caused to victims such as myself, local residents, security of local businesses and all of the other negatives. How can Richmond council afford to maintain it's gardens and flowers etc yet it can't put security and protection for the public at the forefront of priorities. I bet if a member of the council was assaulted the cameras would no doubt be turned back on within the hour of the crime happening.
As a victim of assault and a personal license holder I think this is ridiculous. Surely it goes against the governments own objectives under the licensing act 'preventing crime and disorder'. If a pub switched it's CCTV off and an assault happened on it's premises, their license would be revoked, ordered to get some installed and charged hefty fines - something which I have witnessed first hand from working in the licensed trade. Can't have one rule for one and one rule for another. Just creates more stress for everybody and makes the police's job 10x harder not to mention the extra care pubs and license holders will have to take to ensure public safety, we should all be working as one!
This is a brilliant bit of news, especially seeing as two days later I was assaulted. The extra police work that will be involved in order to catch the perpetrators, not just in my case, is surely more costly than 25k a year? Not to mention the extra distress caused to victims such as myself, local residents, security of local businesses and all of the other negatives. How can Richmond council afford to maintain it's gardens and flowers etc yet it can't put security and protection for the public at the forefront of priorities. I bet if a member of the council was assaulted the cameras would no doubt be turned back on within the hour of the crime happening. As a victim of assault and a personal license holder I think this is ridiculous. Surely it goes against the governments own objectives under the licensing act 'preventing crime and disorder'. If a pub switched it's CCTV off and an assault happened on it's premises, their license would be revoked, ordered to get some installed and charged hefty fines - something which I have witnessed first hand from working in the licensed trade. Can't have one rule for one and one rule for another. Just creates more stress for everybody and makes the police's job 10x harder not to mention the extra care pubs and license holders will have to take to ensure public safety, we should all be working as one! Dm0203
  • Score: 1

Comments are closed on this article.

Send us your news, pictures and videos

Most read stories

Local Info

Enter your postcode, town or place name

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree