Sir, – In recent years there have been two major failures of NHS dentistry in Leyburn. The first when the local practice rejected NHS work. The second when Prime Care walked away because of financial problems.

Getting such services reinstated proved incredibly difficult. The NHS was like a stone wall. I think that even the great resourcefulness of John Blackie was tested, but he battled on. I found it more than frustrating. Many local people were seriously suffered because of these failures.

Eventually persistence won through, and Alpha were awarded an NHS contract. They have consistently provided a first-class service from Brentwood, Leyburn, and at Hawes. However, within months Brentwood is scheduled to have major redevelopment and the 'dentistry' building will be no more.

For many months there have been rumours of plans by Alpha for a replacement building on the site, but nothing has come into the public forum. No one could doubt the professional commitment of Alpha to continue first class dentistry, but they simply cannot control the situation themselves. The site is, or will be owned and controlled by Broadacres. However, apart from that complication, no project of this sort could proceed without the support and finance from the NHS. There is, thus, a trio of interests that must work together.

The NHS has a legal duty to ensure provision of dentistry, but if past performance is anything go by, no one should hold their breath. I know that people are increasingly asking just what is going on. What seems to be a mystery is of help to no one. It simply increases anxiety.

Do we not deserve an urgent combined statement from the NHS, Broadacres, and Alpha:

1. explaining how long the existing building will be available for dentistry.

2. guaranteeing that such availability will continue until a replacement building and service is on stream.

3. explaining the timescale/dates for the various events.

Time is truly of the essence. This is a public issue, and local people are entitled to a thorough explanation and an assurance that there will be continuity of dental services. If such services fail again, no one should assume they will be rapidly restored, if at all.

I look forward to the combined statement. I suspect many others will.

MERVYN WILMINGTON

Harmby, Leyburn.